the religion islam

Global Clash

by Tariq Majeed

Design for Provoking A Global Clash
Ideas are a greater force than military weapons and other material movers of things. Malicious ideas can wreak much more havoc than acts of terrorism. General public cannot differentiate between false ideas and facts. When false ideas are crafted and presented as facts and are focused on the public mind from different sources and in a variety of forms, they are accepted even by the intelligentsia.
Conviction formed by false ideas or misinformation, if it remains unchecked, can be nurtured to the extent that people will blindly act on it or in accord with it and will not readily relinquish their conviction even after the falseness of its basis was owned by the originators. Such is the perfection in the art of propaganda or psycho-intellectual manipulation, also known as psychological subversion or psychological warfare (Psy-War).
Propaganda achieves its planned impact effectively and quickly when it is disseminated with a facade of scholarship and through such print or electronic media organs which have acquired an image of credibility. The theory and craft of manipulating people by misleading ideas, false theories and make-believe (and also by money and vice) is most elaborately expounded in the document titled Protocols of the Meetings of the Elders of Zion, popularly known as the Zionist Protocols. This secret document, leaked to public in 1905, set out, more than a hundred years ago, a sinister plot along with a detailed diabolical plan of action to overthrow the global order and civilisation, capture control of the world and impose a New World Order under a One-World Government ruled by Zionist International Jewry (ZINJRY). Its Psy-War techniques have been closely followed by Imperialist or neo-colonialist powers against their opponents and targets in pursuit of their avaricious international aims. A famous follower of the craft was Adolf Hitler's propaganda minister, Joseph P. Goebbels, himself of Jewish origin.
In contemporary world of power politics, Psy-War, fuelled by revolutionary information technology, has become the most effective and foremost weapon for projection and exercise of power and for making political, economic and military gains. In the United States and other major western powers, including Russia, there are, apart from legions of mediamen, regular contingents of academic writers and scholars studiously engaged in propagating concocted stories, cooked up hypotheses, fabricated theories and misinformation in a variety of other forms.
Among them, and enjoying express backing from both the western media and the American establishment, are Samuel P. Huntington, and Francis Fukuyama, both specialists in political science. Huntington became prominent after writing The Clash of Civilisations and the Remaking of World Order, which grew out of his lectures and later, an article on the same subject in 1993. Fukuyama came into limelight after authoring The End of History and the Last Man. His book also was preceded by an essay on the subject. The title indicates the thesis of each book.
It is, however, not any outstanding merit in their books but extensive media coverage, which shot them into prominence. And the reason the western media has granted a popular place and ample space to these two American academics is that the theories being proclaimed by them neatly fit in with the grandiose but mala fide strategic aims that the US and its NATO allies were already pursuing aggressively, but covertly, even before they opened a global war front in the name of fighting terrorism after the September 11 terror strikes in the US. Both the academics have close links with their government and have served in the State Department. The propagandistic nature, and the "value", of their contrived theories is much too obvious. The theories are being given new shades and twists to abet the US global terror war and engineer conditions that should justify the war and facilitate its aims.
In its special issue of December 2001-February 2002, Newsweek carries specially crafted articles by Huntington and Fukuyama. Magazine's Editor-in-Chief announces that "Struggle against terrorism dominates this special edition." And that "Rarely has the entire world been so focused on a single theme." The theme in name is anti-terrorism, but in its description and discussion throughout the magazine, the theme is anti-Islam and anti-Muslim. This, of course, is in line with what the entire US media is doing-endeavouring to plant the idea in the minds of the people that the war against terrorism has to be treated and conducted as war against Islam and its followers.
In Newsweek, the material meant to subvert the minds, is spread over much of the space. The spotlight, however, is taken by Huntington's The Age of Muslim Wars and Fukuyama's Their Target: The Modern World. Not to make it too obvious that the two pieces are chips of the same block or strikes from the same source, they are placed well apart in the magazine's pages. Their designed real perspective comes unhidden in their reproduction in The Nation (December 12, 2001), on a single page with Huntington's article on top of Fukuyama's. Obviously, the authors had purposely chosen the malign words and their sequence in the titles. The subversive idea conveyed by the titles was meant to be instilled in the mind as one looked at them in the index and further in the magazine.
The idea of "clash of civilisations", often in these very words, is repeatedly mentioned. The clash, in Huntington's words is "between Islam and the West." The accusation for it is flung at Muslims. Fukuyama, after referring to September 11 and America's War on Afghanistan, remarks, "Large numbers of Muslims are now mobilised in opposition to the US, and countries around the world are being asked to choose sides in the struggle." Then, without trying to build even any superficially logical basis, but because the target is already pre-determined, he fires his first broadside: "What is going on here? Are we seeing the beginning of a decades-long 'clash of civilisations' pitting the West against Islam, a conflict that expands remorselessly out of the Afghan swamp to engulf ever larger parts of the world?"
His answer is a loud yes, and in that he is even more vociferous than the original protagonist of the pernicious idea of the "clash." Fukuyama is also more venomous, or rather he makes less of a pretence of being unprejudiced than Huntington. Without caring to be oblique, he advises the Bush Administration to be merciless, bomb the target Muslim countries to rubble and occupy them militarily. "German fascism," Fukuyama argues perversely, "didn't collapse because of its internal moral contradictions; it died because Germany was bombed to rubble and occupied by Allied armies."
Then calling attention to Osama bin Laden, whom he portrays as a symbol of Muslim resistance to the western civilisation, Fukuyama continues his savagely sadistic statement: "If Osama is, metaphorically, hanged from a lamppost in the public square by the US forces along with his Taliban protectors, his movement will look much less appealing." Such inhuman mode of thinking in an American academic who calls their value system liberal, tolerant, humane, civilised, should be very surprising. But those who have wrought devastation in Afghanistan by indiscriminate, most ferocious bombardment and killed thousands of innocent civilians there recently, and committed similar cruelties eleven years ago in Iraq and earlier in Vietnam, are also Fukuyama's compatriots, subscribing to the same value system. Both the writers, Fukuyama more so, show a marked deficiency of knowledge of Islam.
This is not surprising, because Islam and anything pertaining to the Islamic history is altogether excluded from the syllabi of studies in the schools and colleges in America. Islamic studies is available only as a subject of special interest in some of the universities. What the Americans, including intellectuals, know about Islam and its value system is what the US media churns out in its perpetual hostile propaganda campaign against the world of Islam, which is designed to misinform the people. Fukuyama is unable to differentiate between Islam and other religions, and states: "Islam, like Christianity, Hinduism, Confucianism, (etc.), is a system of extraordinary complexity."
How wrong he is! Actually, no other religion can be compared with Islam, which being a complete system of life, is far more than a religion. And yet, unlike Hinduism or other religions, Islam's beliefs, values, social practices and ways of worship are simple and straightforward. While a spite for Islam is noticeable in the writings of both, Fukuyama, unlike Huntington, makes no effort to hide it. Not content with spiteful terms, such as, Islamic fundamentalism, Islamic extremism, Islamic radicalism, coined by other propagandists of his ilk, Fukuyama has invented an uglier term, Islamo-fascism, to lash at Islam and make the fictitious "Islamic threat" look still bigger and more menacing. He uses it like a refrain, in the second half of his article. Fukuyama states, without much subtlety, that the purer version of Islam cannot be resurrected and should be considered dead.
The crux of his thesis against Islam, which also defines the real target of the West's present war, has to be seen in his own words, quoted below. A part of this quotation, which is from the original article, was missing in the reproduction. One can also witness in this text all the four negative elements, prevarication, misinformation, ignorance and prejudice, that run throughout his article.

The Islamic world has seen large populations uprooted from traditional village or tribal life. Many have been urbanized and exposed to a more abstract literary form of Islam that calls them back to a purer version of the religion, just as extremist German Nationalism tried to resurrect a mythical, long-dead racial identity. This new form of radical Islam is immensely appealing because it purports to explain the loss of values and cultural disorientation that the modernisation process has engendered. It may therefore clarify things to say that the present conflict is not simply a fight against terrorism, but rather with Islamo-fascism - that is, the radically intolerant and anti-modern doctrine that has recently arisen in many parts of the Muslim world.

He gives more fire power to his offensive invention:
A strong finger of blame for the rise of Islamo-fascism must point
at Saudi Arabia. Wahabi ideology easily qualifies as Islamo-fascist.

What an accusation being levelled at a government whom the US has cultivated and established as its close ally and from whom it has been receiving all kinds of economic and political support! Then, realising that a large majority of Muslims would still not be covered by the new label that he wants applied to all Muslims except a tiny "liberal" band among them who are fully allied with western interests, Fukuyama makes the label all-encompassing.

The basic conflict we face is much broader," he says, "and concerns not just a small group of terrorists, but a much larger group of radical Islamists and Muslims for whom religious identity overrides all other political values." He specifies them further, in an angry tone: "It is this type of Islamist who refuses to believe that Muslims were involved in the World Trade Center attacks, attributing them instead to Israel!

(The exclamation mark, which is not in the original text, is the only way to convey the spontaneous laughter that erupts as one reaches the end of Fukuyama's ludicrous statement).
There you have the measure of the intellectual depth or rather shallowness of this much-publicised political scientist. This is not the only incidence of its kind. His article is literally dotted with absurd or thoughtless statements. Is Fukuyama so ignorant? He does not know that besides Muslims, there are many other people, including Americans, who are certain that the September 11 terror strikes were masterminded by Israel and carried out by Mossad and CIA for far-reaching political aims, and that if Osama or his followers were used in this, they were used as pawns? Some of the American analysts, in fact, were the first to point at the proofs of this being an Israeli terror operation, and to cite the other villainous operations that Israel had carried out against America.
To think that Osama had the stupendous capabilities and resources that were required to mastermind and successfully carry out these extremely complex air attacks is to abuse one's intelligence. But both Huntington and Fukuyama think so. Each of them has based the substance and argument of his article entirely on this fatuous premise. Huntington blatantly ignores Western powers' insidious scheming in giving birth to and promoting every major regional conflict. He irrationally brands every armed conflict, including the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the US War against Iraq, as Muslim Wars.
Then he writes that with the September 11 strikes which "originated with Osama... the age of Muslim Wars had come home to America." According to him, "The 'New War,' as the US Administration termed the violence that began September 11, is not so new. It is a continuation and escalation of previous patterns of violence involving Muslims." In this episode, he observes, "The makings of a general clash of civilisations exist. Reactions to September 11 and the American response were strictly along civilisational lines." Here, besides his other contrived hypotheses, he deliberately tramples on facts-just to prove his point. He knows that the governments of all the Muslim countries supported America's fight against terrorism; some of them only disagreed with the atrocious method the Bush Administration chose to conduct this fight and to ruthlessly bomb a whole Muslim nation to neutralise a group of alleged terrorists.
One does not have to know the Zionist Protocols to expose the chicanery and misinformation in the articles of Huntington and Fukuyama, and knock down the very basis of their arguments. However, to understand their real motives, what is that design for which they are working, why they have so fiercely targeted Islam, and many other questions, it is necessary to be conversant with the Protocols and also with the literature, which warns the world of the grave perils of the Zionist designs. This includes:

Henry Ford's The International Jew, (1920)
Nesta Webster's World Revolution - The Plot against Civilization, (1922)
Guy Carr's Pawns in the Game, (1958)
Dr Alfred Lilienthal's The Other Side of the Coin, (1965) and The Zionist Connection, (1978)
Roger Garaudy's The Case of Israel - A Study of Political Zionism, (1983)
An eye-opening book They Dare to Speak Out, (1985), by former Congressman Paul Fidley, and this writer's 1995 book The Global Game for a New World Order (with the Zionist Plan for Disintegration of the United States).

Lilienthal, an Anti-Zionist Jew, who also wrote Israel's Flag is Not Mine, writes in his 1978 book: "It has been Zionism and its philosophy, not the particular leadership in power, that has moulded Israeli intransigency and inflexibility... Political Zionists spelled out their plans of expanding from a national home to a state and ultimately to a larger state... Zionist expansionist aspirations are limitless." The book's introduction, summarising its contents notes: "Behind the increasing involvement of the United States (with Israel), Dr. Lilienthal finds the meticulous organisation of Zionism reaching into the White House, mobilising public opinion, exercising control over US Congress, repressing opposition through anti-Semitic labelling, and exerting inordinate influence over the media of information."
Paul Findley's book is a research study of this very subject, which in Senator James G. Abourezk's words is, "The extraordinary influence of the Zionist Lobby." Abourezk warned: "The United States is likely to become, if it has not already, a captive of its client state." Similar warnings, expressed by a number of leading Americans, including Senator William Fulbright, can be found in the book. Sadly for the American people, the formulation and execution of their national policies is entirely in the hands of Zionist Jews whose loyalty is to Israel and who follow the dictates of the ZINJRY's public front, the World Zionist Organisation (WZO).
This very brief exposition is meant to make the people aware that it is the Zionist International Jewry that has thrust the deceived American nation into the so-called war on terrorism. It was to bring that otherwise impossible situation about, as also for other objectives, that the benumbing sudden cataclysm of September 11 was engineered by Mossad with the help of Israelis in America. A study of the Zionist Protocols and its related literature shows that what has been happening in the contemporary world, the direction of current developments, and exercise of international power by a consortium of the United States, the European Union and International Bankers, is in accordance with the Zionist World Order (ZWO) that the document seeks to establish.
Its real aims, some of which are given below, are hidden behind a reformist-looking agenda deceptively named New World Order.

Breaking up all nation states into ethnic, irreligious mini/city states; combining the mini-states on ethnic/linguistic basis into regional federations on European Union's model, in which the decisive power to rule rests with the Executive whose members are selected not elected.
Engendering wrenching economic, political, psychological and social shocks in the US, breaking it up and replacing it by the EU as a superpower, and replacing the dollar by the Euro as the international currency.
Expanding the Zionist state of Israel to the so-called biblical boundaries of a 'greater Israel', making it the regional federation leader and a member of the EU.
Creating centralised global systems in all fields of life, for example, trade, finance, information, education, human rights, law and order.
Abolishing sentiments and concepts of state sovereignty, state rights over the natural/vital national assets and resources, national ideology, nationalism, patriotism, spirituality, religion-based moral and social values, and the Divine basis of all creation; and imposing world-wide the ideology of Zionism and its anti-God, immoral, materialistic value system.
Maligning, ridiculing and discrediting the teachings of Islam to create inferiority complex and alienation from Islam in its followers, and render them incapable of developing Islam into a modern dynamic political, economic and moral force; seizing Islam's holiest places to demolish or desecrate them and deny the Muslims access to them.
Restructuring the UN and its Security Council, and setting up a Zionist One-World Government, exercising control over the regional federations and all the global systems.

With this background, it can now be understood what lies behind Fukuyama's remark in his article that "bringing the global village closer together," (is making) "traditional nation-states irrelevant." Nation-states are not irrelevant, but the idea is being planted, as the planned subversive process for their fragmentation and disbandment is already advancing.
Global village, a term coined several years ago, is the precursor of One-World concept. Fukuyama's grudge that "Islam is the one major world culture that does have some very basic problems with modernity," also reveals its real reason now. Modernity, besides Western Values and Liberal Democracy, which he admits embodies sexual permissiveness and homosexuality," is his name for the anti-God, immoral, materialistic culture of Zionism. Brazenly he claims "Western values embody a universal process." He means they would be, or rather are being, accepted by the whole world - except the Muslims, and that piques him.
It is by studying the Protocols and its envisaged Zionist World Order that one understands why the dead notion of "End of History," negated and rejected by History itself, was revived and so widely publicised. The concept was advanced by the 19th century German philosopher, G.W. Friedrich Hegel, and taken up by Karl Marx for his own purpose. Hegel viewed history as social progression proceeding in stages toward a final outcome with formation of a rationally ordered community, and thought the final outcome had been achieved in the shape of the Prussian monarchical state.
Marx's vision of end of history in one commentator's words was: "a brief 'dictatorship of the proletariat' that would establish a truly communist society, the state would then wither away and man at last become 'fully human' in a classless society." Fukuyama describes his theory in his article as follows: "More than 10 years ago, I argued that we had reached the 'end of history'; not that historical events would stop, but that history, understood as the evolution of human societies through different forms of government, had culminated in modern liberal democracy and market-oriented capitalism. It is my view that this hypothesis remains correct." This hypothesis comes straight from the Zionist Protocols, which repeatedly imply that, with formal establishment of One-World Government under Zionist rule, history would come to an end.
The theory is destined to be smashed once again. However, Fukuyama, like Huntington and many others, is dutifully playing his part in setting the stage and cultivating the public for the grand finale of the centuries-old Zionist game. He has also now embraced, as his own, Huntington's pursuit of translating the thesis of 'clash of civilisations' into a reality. In their world wide web of deception, spinning false theories is a standard ploy of Zionist schemers to pave the way for their major moves while keeping the world deceived. The devastating Vietnam War was engineered by the Domino Theory, that unless United States intervened militarily, the South would fall to North Vietnam and Communism, creating the falling dominoes effect and country after country in Southeast Asia would fall to Communism.
Of course, it did not happen; Vietnam itself became a member of ASEAN. More recent is the case of the fabricated theory, of a grand design of Czarist Russia/USSR of southward expansion to reach the Arabian Sea, and dominate the Oil Gulf, which was masqueraded as the motive behind the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. In 1991, American and Israeli forces occupied the Gulf while Soviet Union broke up. 'Clash of Civilisations' is an invention in the same league.
Its target is Islam and its followers, considered by the Zionist Jewry to be the greatest, and now the only remaining, hindrance in the way of the Zionist World Order. Actually, the anti-God, anti-humanity Zionist Order is abhorrent to all people except Zionist Jews and Zionist Gentiles. But people, other than Muslims, have been left bereft of the moral force of revealed religion or of any noble ideology. Christians and non-Zionist Jews are firmly in the grip of Zionism and cannot free themselves without outside help.
Dr. Lilienthal observes in The Other Side of the Coin: "While most Americans do not understand Zionism, this has not prevented many Jewish organisations from weaving Zionist goals, doctrine and public statements into their daily agenda." Exactly same is the case in all the countries where western culture dominates. Muslims will always have the motivational force and the moral compulsion of Islam to challenge and resist the Zionist ideology and its malignant system. The Zionist Jewry knows this well. It has been trying to subvert this God-given system of life for centuries, and with full force since the Congress of Vienna in 1815, when it felt it had completed its conquest over Europe and Christendom.
In their war against Islam, the Zionists are using those tactics particularly, which they used successfully to corrupt and defame Christianity. Their own agents put on the guise of the target community and carry out subversion from inside. At the same time, they indoctrinate and programme selective individuals from the community to act in ways that in essence advance the Zionist designs. With its resources, defined goals and steady structure of leadership, the ZINJRY is able to plan its schemes decades in advance, and begin the required publicity and Psy-War accordingly. This is how the theories of end of history and clash of civilisations appeared around a decade before the September 11 scheme.
Now we come to a point of crucial importance, for comprehending fully the global design that the principal Zionist propagandists are pursuing and, more so, the vast dimensions of the planning and operational effort behind that design. Would you believe that the war, unleashed by the US after the September 11 terror, that in all but name is already a war against the world of Islam, had been conceived and planned 140 years ago? This extraordinary scheme of mega-time advance planning is exposed in Commander Guy Carr's research work, Pawns in the Game. General Albert Pike, a top Zionist/Illuminati schemer, operating from a "13-room mansion in Little Rock, Arkansas, USA, between 1859 and l871, worked out the details of a military blueprint for three world wars, which he considered would further the conspiracy (of One-World government) during the 20th century."
"World War I was to be fought to overthrow the power of the Czars and turn that country into the stronghold of atheistic Communism," and to give rise to Fascism and Nazism, which would be used to foment World War II. In that War, these forces "would be destroyed and the power of political Zionism increased so that the sovereign state of Israel could be established in Palestine." World War III "is to be directed in such a manner that Islam, the Arab World including Mohammedanism, and the forces fighting it will destroy themselves." On August 15, 1871, Pike wrote to the Italian Zionist leader Guiseppi Mazzini that after World War III is ended, those who aspire to undisputed world domination will provoke the greatest social cataclysm the world has ever known. Carr has reproduced the letter from the original held in the British Museum Library, London.
What the world is facing today is the beginning of World War III, Zionism's War against not just Islam but the whole world, because it is going to turn it into a global clash. One thing is, however, certain. Zionism will lose this war. The power of idea is the decisive factor. In any clash of ideas, Islam remains invincible. Besides, while the states which depend on nationalism for their unity would break up, the Muslim countries based on Islamic Ideology and Two-Nation Theory will remain intact and, in fact, will become stronger.

The September 11 Scheme
As for Fukuyama, like Huntington, treating the September 11 terrorism as a tower to stand upon to proclaim the same thesis of so-called clash between the West and Islam, he begins his invidious article thus: "World politics, it would seem, shifted gears abruptly after September 11."
Further he writes, "Events since September 11 challenge the view that Western institutions and values that include "sexual permissiveness, homosexuality, liberal democracy, etc., that he cleverly calls 'Modernity', "represent universal aspirations that will ultimately be shared by people all over the world." The challenge in Fukuyama's view comes only from Muslims, because, he argues, "Islam is the one major world culture that does have some very basic problems with Modernity." He believes the challenge has become colossal as "Osama bin Laden gained enormous popularity throughout the Muslim world by successfully attacking the Twin Towers."
It is necessary to debunk this canard, this false charge, against Osama bin Laden, fabricated by the very agency which actually perpetrated the September 11 mega-terror in America. It can be done without dissecting the whole episode, as apart from the facts derived straight from the circumstantial evidence, some key proofs leading to the real mega-terrorists have also become known since the event. We should take a look at just a summary of the main points from the thoughtful studies of September 11 put out on the Internet by two prominent Americans, David Duke, former Member of House of Representatives, state of Louisiana, and national President European-American Unity and Rights Organisation, and Carol Valentine, President of Public Action Inc., and curator of the Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum.
Here is an excerpt from David Duke's study titled, How Israeli Terrorism and American Treason Caused the September 11 Attacks.

The Mossad is the most ruthless terrorist organisation in the world. It prides itself on infiltrating every militant organisation on earth. There can be little doubt Mossad has deeply penetrated bin Laden's Al-Qaeda. Powerful evidence is mounting that Israel had foreknowledge of September 11 attack. And, if indeed they had foreknowledge of these murderous acts of terrorism - and then had the cold-blooded mentality not to warn the United States because they saw a horrendous massacre of thousands of Americans as good for Israel - it follows that they would have felt no restraint from actually instigating and covertly aiding this terrorist plan through their own agent provocateurs. There is hard evidence of Mossad treachery in the September 11 attack.
The day after the attack, the Jerusalem Post reported: "The Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem has so far received the names of 4,000 Israelis believed to have been in the areas of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon at the time of the attack. Logic alone would tell you that there would be thousands of Israelis in the WTC at the time of the attacks. New York is the centre of world-wide Jewish financial power, and the World Trade Center is at its epicentre. Many executives in the firms, for example, Goldman-Sachs and Solomon Brothers, with offices in the Twin Towers, regularly commute back and forth to Israel. When George Bush made his speech before Congress, he made a point to say that in addition to thousands of Americans, 130 Israelis died in the WTC.
It seemed suspiciously low to me. I asked myself how there could be only 130 Israelis dead, while there were an estimated 199 dead from Columbia and 428 from the Philippines? (Then) I discovered the most shocking fact I have ever run across in all my years of research and writing. I discovered a simple fact that has enormous ramifications in regard to the September terror attack. I found a New York Times (September 22, 2001) piece that clarified that of the 130 Israelis President Bush claimed had died in the WTC, 129 of them were still alive; only one Israeli had actually died! According to The NYT: "Alon Pinkas, Israel's consul general in New York, said there were, in fact, only three Israelis who had been confirmed as dead: two on the planes and one who had been visiting the Towers on business and who was identified and buried."
This suggested that many Israelis had been warned before the attack. I quickly found an article in Newsbytes (September 27), a news service of The Washington Post, titled Instant Messages To Israel Warned of WTC Attack. The Israeli daily, Ha'aretz, September 29, confirmed the prior warnings to Israel, received (and further passed) by an Israeli Messaging firm, Odigo, with offices in both the WTC and Israel. Reports by the two sources said: "Officials at Odigo, New York, confirmed that employees received text messages warning of an attack on the World Trade Center two hours before terrorists crashed planes into the New York landmarks." "Alex Diamandis, vice-president, confirmed that workers in Odigos R&D office in Israel received a warning from another Odigo user two hours prior to the first attack."
So now we have powerful and convincing evidence from impeccable sources that Israel had foreknowledge of the attack. Who would have warned Israelis of the impending attack, if not Israel's Mossad? The fact (is) that Israel's government had warned potential Israeli victims, but then deliberately let thousands of Americans die. You can be sure that joy rose in the hearts of all Israeli terrorists as they witnessed the smoke plume from the Twin Towers. The FBI even arrested five Israelis on a rooftop near the WTC, videotaping and cheering the entire event. (A few hours after the attack) when a reporter asked the former Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, "what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, he replied, 'It's very good... It will generate immediate sympathy."'(The NYT, September 12).
The WTC Attack was obviously very good for Israel; in fact, Israel is the only nation who benefited from it. When America will come to finally understand that what is good for the terrorist state of Israel, is destructive and even deadly for the United States of America? When will we get the backbone to put a stop to the Israeli agents and American traitors who have orchestrated 50 years of support for Israeli terrorism and 50 years of treason against our own country?"

Carol Valentine's study, summarised below, is even more searching.

Four jets took off within 15 minutes of each other at Boston, Dulles and Newark airports, and roughly two hours later it was over. The attacks had to be tightly co-ordinated. WTC had been hit by 9:06 am and the New York airports had been closed since 9:17 am. It would have been impossible for an air traffic controller on duty between 9:45-10:00 am not to know that commercial air traffic in the US was in a dire emergency from suicide planes. And now Flight 93 (destined for San Francisco from New Ark) calls in, asking permission to do a U-turn, fly East an hour and a half, and land in Washington DC? One'd love to hear the REAL conversation between Flight 93 and the air traffic controllers!
Something went wrong with the masterminds plan. So Flight 93 was shot down. They could not afford to have the hijackers survive and the electronic controls of the plane examined. According to Washington Post, September 12, 2001, the air traffic controllers at the Dulles Airport had time to warn the White House that Flight 77 (to San Francisco) was aimed directly at the President's mansion and was travelling at a gut-wrenching speed, full throttle. But just as the plane seemed to be on a suicide mission into the White House, it executed a pivot so tight that it reminded observers of a fighter jet manoeuvre! The plane circled 270 degrees from the right to approach the Pentagon from the West.
Flight 11 (Boston-Los Angeles) was allegedly piloted by Muhammad Atta, who couldn't fly. "Boston Airport officials said they did not spot the plane's course until it had crashed, and said the control tower had no unusual communications with the pilot" (Washington Post September 12). Now compare it to the very different story that appeared a day later in the Christian Science Monitor: "The Airline's Pilot stayed at the helm of hijacked Flight 11 much of the way from Boston to New York, sending surreptitious radio transmissions to the authorities on the ground (indicating there was a hijacker on board). The conversations between the pilot and the hijacker were overheard by the pilot's talk button.
Before September 11, the combined forces of the US Military and Domestic Intelligence, the CIA, the FBI, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, were clueless that such a catastrophic event would occur. Yet a day or so later, the FBI had secured the names and mugshots of 19 hijackers! How did the FBI know who the hijackers were? After all, all the witnesses are dead. How could the FBI distinguish between regular Muslims and hijacker Muslims on those flights? Or did they just go through the passenger lists culling out the Muslim-sounding names and labelling the people bearing those names as hijackers? You are Muslim so you are a hijacker.
On September 30, I looked at the Passenger Lists of those four Flights. To my surprise, the lists contained none of the hijackers names! Yet we are asked to believe that the culprits took four jet airliners, with four sets of crews and four sets of passengers armed with plastic knives and box cutters. In fact, we 'Must' believe that a man who dresses in white sheets, lives in a tent or a cave in the middle of nowhere - Osama bin Laden - was the mastermind. He used his $300 million to pull off Operation 911. Come to think of it, doesn't the FBI know his banker? And given that the world's banking system is highly centralised and in the hands of bin Laden's avowed Enemies, how could our terrorist tent-dweller have retained this fortune all these years?
We know that the US and its allies would not conspire to attack America. Or do we? The Army's School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS) thinks Israel is capable of doing exactly that. On September 10, 2001, The Washington Times ran a front page story which quoted (from the study): "Of the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, the SAMS officers say: 'Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target US forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act."' Just 24 hours after this story appeared, the WTC and the Pentagon was hit and the Arabs were being blamed. Some Americans are traitors and pay allegiance to Israel. Recall the June 8, 1967, Israeli attack on the USS Liberty and American complicity in the attack.
During the Six Day War, the Liberty, an American intelligence gathering ship, was sailing in international waters. Israeli aircraft and torpedo boats attacked it for 75 minutes. When four US fighter jets from a nearby aircraft carrier came to protect the Liberty, US Defense Secretary Robert McNamara ordered the jets NOT to come to the Liberty's aid, and allowed the Israeli attack to continue. Thirty-four Americans were killed and 171 wounded. In other words, US allies and people within the US military establishment are not opposed to killing American servicemen and civilians, given the "right" goal.

After reading the two summaries, does it leave any doubt about the identity of the masterminds of the September 11 mega-terror? While Duke has proved Israel's direct involvement in the terror attack, the analysis presented by Valentine shows it to be Israel's own act of terrorism. Both have charged "American traitors" of complicity with Israel. They are none other but American Zionist Jews also holding Israeli nationality who, in Valentines's words, "pay allegiance to Israel." Valentine thinks there were no hijackers onboard, nor were the pilots in control of the planes; in other words they were remotely controlled from the ground. This has been confirmed by professional military and civil pilots. In April 2001, news media reported of a successful long distance remotely controlled experimental flight in which a robotised large jet plane was flown by remote control from Edwards Air Force Base in California to an Australian Air Force base in South Australia.
Actually, any objective analysis of the event brings it out that the masterminds, besides other essential capabilities, had to have:

Thorough penetration into: the two Airlines whose planes were seized for the strikes, the Airport Security at Boston, New Ark and Dulles, the US Federal Aviation Administration to which air traffic controllers belong, the Security at the World Trade Center, the External Threat Security System for Pentagon and White House, the US Air Defense Command, and all the US Intelligence Agencies, listed earlier.
Ability to enlist active covert support of certain key personnel in all the above-mentioned organisations for precise planning and successful conduct of the terror strikes, and for ensuring implementation of the planned post-attack actions, for example, producing fabricated evidence of hijackers, doctoring of passenger lists and communication records, focusing of investigations on Muslims.
Ability to make the Bush Administration react to the strikes and take various actions within the US and in the international sphere in line with the designed aims of the terror operation.
Ability to arrange spontaneous live television coverage of the aeroplane strikes, and to direct the American and European media, after the strikes, to generate and conduct the publicity, deception and Psy-War required to meet the designed aims.

No country enjoys such influence and freedom of access and action within the US, as to have the noted capabilities, except Israel. Besides, Israel alone has full access to the advance aeroplane remote-control technology developed in America at Jewish-controlled R&D facilities. Similarly, no country, not even America, exercises such power over the western media as does Israel, because the media is owned and controlled by Zionist Jews. The Mossad maintains a whole army of dedicated agents from among the American-Israelis and Israeli-Americans serving at key posts in all the important civil and military institutions in America. Besides people at large, many in America know already that the September 11 mega-terror was perpetrated by Israel.
Before long, as the Zionist/Israeli aims, especially the dreadful aims against the US, behind this awful act of terrorism become clearer to the American masses, more and more Americans will come forward to expose the hitherto hidden details of this Israeli terrorism and to tell the full story. Where do the articles of Huntington and Fukuyama stand now, with the pillar of their argument, that Osama bin Laden had masterminded the September 11 strikes, demolished? Don't they fall crashing to the ground?