18th June 2003
Journalists of Pakistan
|
|
by Weekly Independant -- Source: www.InformationTimes.com
|
|
Principles Are Supreme
Issue 51, Vol. 2 - June 12-18, 2003
When we launched Weekly Independent on August 3, 2001, we vowed to make
the journal a guardian of the people's rights. This meant defending the
fledgling democracy in Pakistan from onslaughts of the mighty military
establishment, always waiting in the wings to derail it, and at the same
time exposing corruption and dishonesty on the part of the high and
mighty.
The independent policy of the Weekly was bound to invite the
establishment's wrath which soon made it clear that the publication
could not get its due quota of the government advertisement unless it
stopped carrying news reports and comments that embarrassed the military
regime. But refusing to yield on
principles, the paper continued to criticise the undue involvement of
the [Pakistan] Army and the Inter-Services Intelligence [ISI] in the
national politics. The establishment's pressure on the Weekly
subsequently assumed the form of intimidatory tactics.
In March this year, the regime redoubled its moves to harass the
editorial staff as well as the chief executive of the paper. The Home
secretary, Punjab, a retired brigadier and former chief of Punjab ISI,
called the Chief Executive and told him to roll-back operations of the
paper immediately if he wanted to stay in business and stay safe.
Similar threats were conveyed to the editorial staff. The matter was
brought to the notice of the national and international journalist
organisations. The strong protests by the journalist community put the
administration on the defensive and direct intimidation was suspended
for the time being. However, more devious ways to throttle the paper
were adopted, and the private sector companies were compelled to stop
putting ads in the Weekly Independent.
The paper, however, refused to bargain on its independent policy
position and continued to oppose anti-democracy measures introduced by
the first commando 'President' of Pakistan. The paper criticised General
Musharraf for usurping powers of the elected Parliament, pleading that
he should not simultaneously hold the civilian and military slots of the
President and the Army Chief. Through its editorials, the paper pleaded
for national reconciliation by allowing the exiled political leadership
to return to the country in safety and without any fear of further
intimidation. As the Weekly refused to change its independent editorial
policy by toeing the establishment's line, the regime decided to launch
a fresh assault against the editorial staff and the investors.
Last month, an Islamabad-based news agency, financed by the federal
government and protected by General Musharraf's closest aide, ran a
report claiming that the Jamali-led Musharraf government was
investigating the Editor of Weekly Independent for indulging in
anti-Musharraf, anti-Army and anti-Pakistan 'propaganda' with the
financial assistance given by exiled leaders Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz
Sharif. The move, however, again failed to deter the paper from pursuing
independent journalism. Another malicious report was subsequently
planted in an Urdu newspaper early this month, saying that the
government agencies had launched an inquiry against the owner of the
publication for allegedly receiving millions of rupees from Saudi
Arabia, where Sharif is living in exile, to malign General Musharraf and
the Pakistan Army.
As all such devious moves failed to weaken the resolve of the paper to
continue its struggle for people's rights and a genuine democratic
polity, a fresh attempt is now afoot to suppress the independent voice.
A libel notice served on the paper on behalf of General Musharraf's
right-hand-man Tariq Aziz Warraich, Secretary, National Security
Council, demands payment of Rs 50,000,000 and an apology for two reports
we carried in the recent past.
We would like to inform our readers that Weekly Independent is under
tremendous government pressure right now, though its resolve to stick to
an independent policy remains unshaken. In a country where Army
dominates the polity, and officials of the security agencies telephone
editors and financiers to tell them what their publications should or
should not contain, publishing a journal with an independent and honest
approach is no easy job. Anyone dedicated to the ideals of our founding
fathers who wanted to see Pakistan as a modern democratic state, with
the Army being subservient to the elected Parliament, would endorse the
editorial policy of the magazine. We have tried our best to maintain
independence of the Weekly, and would continue to withstand the
government pressure as long as we are allowed to pursue an independent
policy.