10th June 2003
Lies About Iraq War
|
|
by Imad Khadduri -- Source: www.YellowTimes.org
|
|
The Mobile Lies
As the swelter of anger bubbles from the machination of
misinformation that led to the faltering WMD casus belli for invading Iraq,
the retreat and half-baked excuses of Bush, Blair, Cheney, Wolfowitz and
Powell further expose the sharp edge of their deceit. Whether it
was "intelligence" failure or "flailing" the intelligence, time will soon
tell. In the meantime, the fig leaves keep falling.
During CNN's Late Edition with Colin Powell, reported by the Toronto Star on
June 9, 2003, Powell claimed that "the two alleged mobile biological weapons
labs, which are being studied by allied inspectors now in Iraq, are the same
ones he described to the world last Feb. 5 at a U.N. presentation which was
the result of four days and four nights of meetings with the CIA." "I stand
behind that presentation," he said.
He further asserted, "I'll give you the killer argument why these vans were
exactly what I said they were. I can assure you that if those biological
vans were not ... what I said they were on the 5th of February, on the 6th
of February Iraq would have hauled those vans out, put them in front of a
press conference, given them to U.N. inspectors to try to drive a stake
through the heart of my presentation."
Only if the Iraqis knew which vans he was talking about
In an article published on the same day as Powell's interview, Peter
Beaumont and Antony Barnett reported in the Observer that there is mounting
indications that these vans were for "balloons, not germs."
The Iraqis concur
According to the article, "Senior Iraqi officials of the al-Kindi Research,
Testing, Development, and Engineering facility in Mosul were shown pictures
of the mobile production trailers, and they claimed that the trailers were
used to produce hydrogen chemically for artillery weather balloons.
Artillery balloons are essentially balloons that are sent up into the
atmosphere and relay information on wind direction and speed, allowing more
accurate artillery fire. Crucially, these systems need to be mobile. The
Observer has discovered that not only did the Iraq military have such a
system at one time, but that it was actually sold to them by the British. In
1987, Marconi, now known as AMS, sold the Iraqi army an Artillery
Meteorological System or Amets for short."
Other experts who have examined the evidence agree and have cast doubt over
the Bush administration's assertions. They argue that the lack of any trace
of pathogens found in the fermentation tanks, the use of canvas sides on
vehicles where technicians would be working with dangerous germ cultures,
and the lack of an autoclave for steam sterilization all provide credence to
the Iraqi argument that the labs were merely used for artillery balloons.
In fact, the American experts themselves concede that the van could, at
best, serve only one stage of the process for biological weapons production.
There would need to be three or four other stages in the process, or other
complementary vans, to be able to produce Powell's less than heuristic
claim.
Powell is not new to this misinformation game
In my earlier article, "The demise of the nuclear bomb hoax," published on
February 16, 2003, I referred to Geoff Simons' The Scourging of Iraq in
which "Washington lied persistently and comprehensively to gain the required
international support [for the Gulf war]. For example, the U.S. claimed to
have satellite pictures showing a massive Iraqi military build-up on the
Saudi/ Iraqi border. When sample photographs were later obtained from Soyuz
Karta by an enterprising journalist, no such evidence was discernible."
Simons references an article by Maggie O'Kane, published in the Guardian on
16 December 1995, which revealed that the enterprising journalist was Jean
Heller of the St. Petersburg Times in Florida.
Eventually, the U.S. commander -- none other than Colin Powell himself --
admitted that there had been no massing of Iraqi troops. But by then the so-called evidence had served its purpose.
So, was Powell really worried that the Iraqis might "try to drive a stake
through the heart of [his] presentation"?
Well, it's never too late.
[Imad Khadduri has a MSc in Physics from the University of Michigan (United
States) and a PhD in Nuclear Reactor Technology from the University of
Birmingham (United Kingdom). Khadduri worked with the Iraqi Atomic Energy
Commission from 1968 until 1998. He was able to leave Iraq in late 1998 with
his family. He now teaches and works as a network administrator in Toronto,
Canada. He has been interviewed by the United Nations, the International
Atomic Energy Agency, FOX, the Toronto Star, Reuters, and various other news
agencies in regards to his knowledge of the Iraqi nuclear program. This
article was originally printed in YellowTimes.org]