Questions any intelligent journalist should ask about the London bombings. In today’s controlled media, no journalist will be willing to push the boundaries and ask the challenging questions that should be asked of a government increasingly complicit in the recent London bombings. Here are a few:
CCTV cameras were not working in the area at the time of the explosions - the average Londoner is caught on camera three hundred times a day. Who was responsible for disabling the cameras on the morning of July 7th?
Witnesses say they saw "white" people setting off the bombs, not dark skinned people. Which group do these obviously non-Muslim people belong to?
The explosives are said to be military - very difficult to obtain within the UK, so they must have been smuggled in, past sniffer dogs and tight security at Britain’s borders (it’s a much smaller country to patrol than the US). Who arranged for the explosives to make it past Britain’s internal security?
Quotes from the Quran by the alleged group claiming responsibility for the attacks were incorrect - a strictly religious person would not make these mistakes. Who designed and built the site?
The DNS of the fake Islamic website was hosted in Maryland DC. Who was the (now defunct) website registered to?
A consultancy agency with government and police connections was running a drill exercise for an unnamed company which revolved around the London Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as was happening in real life on July 7th. This is precisely what happened on the morning of September 11th 2001 with the CIA conducting drills of flying hijacked planes into the WTC and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning. Are we the gullible people meant to simply swallow this coincidence again?
Benjamin Netanyahu, scheduled to give a speech near the site of the Tube explosion, was warned FIVE MINUTES before the attack to stay in his hotel. Sounds suspiciously like the same thing on 9/11 when the Israeli company Odigo, with an office at the World Trade Center, was warned, and 4,000 of it’s employees stayed home that day. Why are only Israeli’s warned just prior to calamatous events?
The UK is one of the most tolerant countries towards Muslims in Europe - much more so than Germany or France. What purpose would it serve for Muslim radicals to attack an otherwise welcoming British public?
Mobile phone network wasn’t suspended (to prevent detonation by phones). Is this an admission that phones cannot detonate explosives, as was claimed for the Madrid blasts?
"A co-ordinated effort is slowly bringing order out of the chaos," Sir Ian Blair told Sky News. Was this quote an intentional use of the direct translation of the Freemasons’ Satanic motto "Ordo Ab Chao".
Why did a senior police officer tell the BBC less than twenty four hours before the London attacks that the London police felt that they were on top of the terrorist threat?
The London "terror alert" level was lowered before the bombings took place, thus giving the perpetrators extra cover to plan and execute the attack without having to evade the most stringent security. Who authorized the change in the terror alert level?
The anti-terror exercises being conducted at the same times as the bombings were use as a cover for the real events.
The train bombs had been attached to the underside of the carriages.
All four cameras on the No.30 bus had been turned off so that we wouldn’t see there was no bomber on board. The bomb was attached to the underside of a seat.
Because of the wealth of eye-witness and phone-video evidence showing no bombers and the holes in the carriage floors:
The vehicles were wrapped in plastic to keep the damage out of public/media view.
Another fake attack was staged to leave the necessary ‘evidence’ and also to reinforce the official ‘suicide bomber’ story.
After the sophistication of the first attack why did none of the second attack bombs explode?
Why would these people leave a ‘device’ in a bush, or 16 bombs in a van?
Why did the Leeds boys buy return tickets?
Why did they pay to park their car? Why were they carrying so much ID, documents, cards etc. if they were going to kill themselves? (typically suicide bombers don’t) How and why was all this ‘evidence’ left at the Underground stations?
Why would they kill themselves when they could just have left the bombs and get off?
Why are so many commentators on the Internet saying the attacks are typical of Mossad/CIA ‘false flag’ operations?